000 | 01873nam a2200397 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | EDZ0001642356 | ||
003 | StDuBDS | ||
005 | 20211228125616.0 | ||
006 | m||||||||d|||||||| | ||
007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
008 | 170222s2017 ii a fob 001|0|eng|d | ||
020 |
_a9780199088867 (ebook) : _cNo price |
||
040 |
_aStDuBDS _beng _cStDuBDS _erda _epn |
||
050 | 4 | _aKD4080 | |
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a342.41085 _223 |
100 | 1 |
_aChandrachud, Chintan, _eauthor. |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aBalanced constitutionalism : _bcourts and legislatures in India and the United Kingdom / _cChintan Chandrachud. |
250 | _aFirst edition. | ||
264 | 1 |
_aNew Delhi : _bOxford University Press, _c2017. |
|
300 |
_a1 online resource : _billustrations (black and white) |
||
336 |
_atext _2rdacontent |
||
336 |
_astill image _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _2rdacarrier |
||
500 | _aThis edition previously issued in print: 2017. | ||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
520 | 8 | _aThis work examines the promise of a new model against its performance in practice by comparing judicial review under the Human Rights Act (HRA) of the UK to an exemplar of the old model of judicial review, the Indian Constitution. It argues that although the HRA fosters a more balanced allocation of powers between legislatures and courts than the Indian Constitution, it does so for a novel reason. | |
521 | _aSpecialized. | ||
588 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from home page (viewed on February 22, 2017). | ||
610 | 1 | 0 |
_aGreat Britain. _tHuman Rights Act 1998. |
650 | 0 |
_aHuman rights _zGreat Britain. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aConstitutional law _zGreat Britain. |
|
776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version : _z9780199470587 |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_3Oxford scholarship online _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199470587.001.0001 |
942 | _cEB | ||
999 |
_c6810 _d6810 |