Appointment of judges to the Supreme Court of India : transparency, accountability, and independence / Arghya Sengupta and Ritwika Sharma.
Contributor(s): Sengupta, Arghya [editor.] | Sharma, Ritwika [editor.].
Material type:
TextSeries: Oxford scholarship online: Publisher: New Delhi : Oxford University Press, 2019Edition: First edition.Description: 1 online resource.Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9780199096992 (ebook) :.Subject(s): India. Supreme Court | Judges -- Selection and appointment -- IndiaAdditional physical formats: Print version :: No titleDDC classification: 347.5403534 Online resources: Oxford scholarship online Summary: In Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India, the Supreme Court of India, by majority, struck down the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC), established to appoint judges to the Supreme Court of India and High Courts. Unsurprisingly, the NJAC judgment has been the subject of a deeply polarized debate in the public sphere and academia. The essays in this volume analyse the NJAC judgment, and provide a rich context to it, in terms of philosophical, comparative, and constitutional issues that underpin it. The work traces the history of judicial appointments in India; analyses constitutional principles behind selecting judges and their application in the NJAC Case; and comparatively examines the judicial appointments process in six foreign jurisdictions, enquiring into what makes a good judge and an effective appointments process.
| Item type | Current location | Call number | URL | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E Books
|
TNNLU LIBRARY | https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199485079.001.0001 | Not For Loan | EBK00411 |
This edition also issued in print: 2018.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
In Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India, the Supreme Court of India, by majority, struck down the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC), established to appoint judges to the Supreme Court of India and High Courts. Unsurprisingly, the NJAC judgment has been the subject of a deeply polarized debate in the public sphere and academia. The essays in this volume analyse the NJAC judgment, and provide a rich context to it, in terms of philosophical, comparative, and constitutional issues that underpin it. The work traces the history of judicial appointments in India; analyses constitutional principles behind selecting judges and their application in the NJAC Case; and comparatively examines the judicial appointments process in six foreign jurisdictions, enquiring into what makes a good judge and an effective appointments process.
Specialized.
Description based on online resource; title from home page (viewed on July 11, 2019).
There are no comments for this item.